Why should a man provide for a woman, and should he?
This topic is relevant and has long been controversial. The debates are ongoing, and opinions and arguments vary widely. But is this topic truly fruitful for discussion? It”s no secret that it”s mostly men who are trying to get to the bottom of this, as the word “should” places a great deal of responsibility on men, and men are held accountable not only for themselves and their actions, but also for women. So, if men should provide, why should they?
Article Contents:
Historical Excursion
Since ancient times, from primitive societies almost to the Middle Ages, the man was the head of the family. Thus, he found himself on every continent, and then in every country. Women had many responsibilities, such as cooking, washing, cleaning, gardening, raising livestock, childcare, and so on, but at the same time, they had the fewest. As a rule, women disregarded other people and didn”t ask them about anything. The man was the master and head of the family, but he made all decisions himself and didn”t consult with women.
Marriages were also entered into without the woman”s consent. Here, problems were resolved within the family or with the father. Such traditions still persist among some white people, and for them, it”s completely normal, and nothing surprising for women. But when women don”t make decisions and aren”t consulted, the majority of the responsibility for providing for the family falls on the shoulders of men. And this is completely normal and nothing surprising.
Over time, women gradually began to gain certain rights along with responsibilities, but, of course, men and women didn”t immediately become equal. The most interesting thing is that for a long time, women didn”t particularly fight for their rights, but why? Yes, because in practice, everything was decided for them, and for some, it was truly easy to live that way. Some countries still live this way, upholding these traditions and not thinking of changing anything. Why should men provide for women? Because at some point, without asking a woman what she wanted, he forced her to live by his rules. And no matter how cruel this may sound to people, the man who tames them bears responsibility.
Thus, it turns out that this responsibility was passed on to men from distant ancestors “by inheritance.” Today, at the legislative level, men and women are equal in rights and responsibilities, but in life we are accustomed to the fact that the man in the family is the boss, and he decides everything. Until now, some men cannot accept women who earn more than them and feel awkward.
Read also: Should a man provide for a woman: modern realities
Decades ago: “Should men provide for women?” most people would answer yes. The answer was due to long-standing traditions and social factors.
Legislative Level
As mentioned above, at the legislative level, men and women have equal rights and responsibilities towards each other. As for family relations, spouses acquire mutual obligations for family planning only after the official registration of marriage. Only in this case there are rights and obligations associated with family relationships.
Simple cohabitation and official marriage are legally different. Therefore, many men are very afraid of the registry office, since in an open relationship there are much fewer responsibilities. However, if the relationship is registered, then the woman is protected at the legislative level and does not escape responsibility.
Should a man provide for a girl? reaction to Moran Bathory and Vika Mednis
Ethical Side of the Question
If a man must provide for a woman, but for this reason he does not want to, does he owe anyone anything? Therefore, he has the right to raise this issue, but does he want to provide it and does he have such an opportunity? This is a more precise formulation of the question. Here it is necessary to take into account not only the person’s abilities, but also his upbringing and mentality. In some countries, spouses have a separate budget because they don”t owe anyone anything.
However, in Russia, this is very open, and therefore the woman is married. In other words, she stands behind her husband and him. And, of course, the tradition of the wife moving in with her husband is preserved whenever possible. It turns out that a woman should follow her husband everywhere, support and listen to him in everything, but has no right to be financially dependent on him. Moreover, if a woman can”t stay home with the child and work, what should she do? A husband shouldn”t take care of the child, and his wife shouldn”t take care of the mother. Another situation is if a wife loses her job and can”t find a job for a long time, shouldn”t the husband support her? And if they begrudge money for their loved ones, what kind of love is that?
So, dear friend, frankly, no one owes anything to anyone, but conscience does. Moreover, if you”ve chosen a life partner, is it right to begrudge money for the person you truly love, especially if he is one?
Should a man propose to a girl? Answers to Moran Bathory and Vika Medonis
